"The Official Portrait of Miss InDiana"

"The Official Portrait of Miss InDiana"
aka "Miss Victory"

Monday, September 22, 2008

Ron Paul Message to The Nation: Reject McCain & Obama

Here's the link complete with videos including the press conference uniting third party candidates Chuck Baldwin, Cynthia McKinney, and Ralph Nader who issued the following joint statement and agreement:

We Agree

Foreign Policy: The Iraq War must end as quickly as possible with removal of all our soldiers from the region. We must initiate the return of our soldiers from around the world, including Korea, Japan, Europe and the entire Middle East. We must cease the war propaganda, threats of a blockade and plans for attacks on Iran, nor should we re-ignite the cold war with Russia over Georgia. We must be willing to talk to all countries and offer friendship and trade and travel to all who are willing. We must take off the table the threat of a nuclear first strike against all nations.

Privacy: We must protect the privacy and civil liberties of all persons under US jurisdiction. We must repeal or radically change the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, and the FISA legislation. We must reject the notion and practice of torture, eliminations of habeas corpus, secret tribunals, and secret prisons. We must deny immunity for corporations that spy willingly on the people for the benefit of the government. We must reject the unitary presidency, the illegal use of signing statements and excessive use of executive orders.

The National Debt: We believe that there should be no increase in the national debt. The burden of debt placed on the next generation is unjust and already threatening our economy and the value of our dollar. We must pay our bills as we go along and not unfairly place this burden on a future generation.

The Federal Reserve: We seek a thorough investigation, evaluation and audit of the Federal Reserve System and its cozy relationships with the banking, corporate, and other financial institutions. The arbitrary power to create money and credit out of thin air behind closed doors for the benefit of commercial interests must be ended. There should be no taxpayer bailouts of corporations and no corporate subsidies. Corporations should be aggressively prosecuted for their crimes and frauds.

Watch the complete Press Conference from September 10th, 2008.

Open letter from Indiana Porter County Citizen regarding the bailout and NWO

Hoosiers have great common sense. Please read this letter written by one of our own citizens:

To:
Editor American Free Press ; Chesterton Tribune ; Post-Tribune ; The Times
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:48 PM
Subject: The New Federal Bailout Plan Fiasco that Passes Massive Debt onto the Taxpayer

Voice of the People/Letter to The Editor,
This new Federal Bailout Plan is one more communistic plan to eliminate the great American middle class by the government criminals in Washington who wish to make the U.S. a third-rate country in their plans for a "New World Order", and at the same time fill their pockets along the way as well. It is not only unconstitutional but an obvious attempt to unload illegal, worthless assets on the taxpaying citizenry of this country. This debt was incurred by greedy slim-bag bankers who knew what they where doing and expecting such a bailout when their plans for windfall profits came to an ugly end. These perpetrators of this debt should have to eat this debt themselves and then be tried for treason. Obviously, these Washington bloodsuckers have not looked at the real cause of why we are in this horrible economic catastrophe only how they can further screw the public.

All this began with the establishment of a central banking system, the Federal Reserve around 1915, which in itself is unconstitutional and has never been audited. No one but the officials of this evil cabal even know who the banks are from around the world, who enjoy and reap the unbelievable rewards they receive from the massive interest income they obtain from the huge loans they make to our country (one of their biggest bonanzas comes from the constant wars they want to keep us in that they finance and support. The income taxes we pay primarily go to paying the interest on these debts to them.).

We should not be bailing out A.I.G. or any other financial institutions that are responsible for this mess. What we need to do is to get our financial system back to the basics spelled out very clearly in our Constitution.

Every elected politician in our country has taken an oath, when elected to their office, which says, "I do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will faithfully execute the office of _________of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

It is because these unpatriotic selfish elected officials have ignored the tenets of our Constitution that we find ourselves in this financial and sovereign mess.
Since these self-serving people are getting ready to cram this Bailout Plan down our throats as quickly as they can, I strong urge the readers of this letter to call your U.S. Representative and your two Senators and express your opinion on this phony self-serving bailout.plan and remind them of their oath of office. Their names and phone numbers can easily be obtained from your local library, the phone book and your newspaper (if you still read one). .Then pass this alert along to those you know who might be more than a little concerned and angry too.
Gerry Hébert
Liberty Township, Porter County, Indiana
1-219-926-7576 .

Ron Paul on Wolf Blitzer's CNN show yesterday

Listen to Ron Paul....LISTEN! He is the ONLY sober person talking. Everyone else is melting down, giving in, listening to the very people who caused the mess for advice. If you hire a contractor who screws up a project, you fire that contractor and hire someone who knows what he is doing. This bailout plan puts an appointed (not elected) bureaucrat in charge of the problem. Dr. Paul also calls out McCain's MFI program as just another worthless bureaucratic program that won't work...just like the rest of them don't.

He says the bailout is not "saving" Main Street, but is "sticking it" to Main Street.

Here's a new You Tube with Ron Paul on yesterday's Wolf Blitzer show on CNN.

RON PAUL: "Without the bailout we’d have a bad year, but with the bailouts it will be a bad decade”.

Everywhere we keep reading and hearing the talking heads say how the alternative to the bailout would be much worse.

I keep hearing this “we are helping main street” narrative from the supporters of the bailout.

Ron Paul said it best yesterday on CNN when he said that without the bailout we’d “have a bad year” but with the bailouts it “will be a bad decade”. I’m afraid, very afraid that Ron Paul is right again.

The Best Way to Register Your Opposition to the Big Bank Bailout

Thanks to our friend Kurt, for sending this helpful information. If you oppose the bailout make your calls, faxes, emails happen today. Send snail mail certified. Get your point across immediately to Congress that you are against the bailout. These immoral thieves are saddling at least two generations of our children to pay for their greed.

The Best Way to Register Your Opposition to the Big Bank Bailout
Gary North

September 22, 2008

If you are opposed to a minimal $700 billion bailout of the banks, you had better protest now.

Contact your representative in the House of Representatives. They are more responsive than Senators.

Contact him/her by phone. Do not waste the time of the poor person who answers.Be polite. Just tell the person that you oppose the bank bailout, and that you hope that your representative will vote against it. Do not explain why.

Immediately write a snail mail letter saying the same thing. Basic points:
The Federal deficit is too large as it is
It's a burden that taxpayers cannot afford
It's a bailout of bankers, not little people
This is only a down payment; they will be back for more
This is not fair to people who saved and played by the rules
You intend to vote against every politician who votes for it, even if this means voting for a [Democrat/Republican]
Send it today.

It does far less good to send an email.

Do not bother to contact a politician from another state.

To find out who your representative is, click here:


Senators are listed by state in the drop-down box in the upper right-hand corner:

http://www.senate.gov

Sunday, September 21, 2008

• Seniors Hit Hard by Financial Crisis

Mortgage Crisis? Act Now to Avoid Foreclosure
Avoiding Foreclosure Takes More Than Hope
Seniors Hit Hard by Financial Crisis
Mortgage Rates Fall for Fifth Straight Week
Lenders Offering Homeowners Little Aid, Congress Told
August Housing Starts Near 18-Year LowMortgage Rates Plunge
Inflation Rising, Home Construction Falling
Rise in Mortgage Rates Linked to Falling House Prices
Has the Bear Market Hit Bottom Yet?
Inflation Surges in July
Sales of Existing Homes Hit 10-Year-Low
Foreclosure Activity Up 55 Percent In July
West Virginia Sues Countrywide Financial
Pending Home Sales Rise In June
---
More ...

TAXPAYER ALERT: Monday's City Council Meeting - September 22

Ernie Shearer has been going to city council meetings for years before I got involved. We became activist friends through the election last year. He sent me this notice and asked me to ask all of you to show up. Looks like they (the Democrats) are trying to pull some shenanigans again to embarrass the Mayor and screw with our money.

The meeting starts at 7pm, Monday, September 22 @ the City Council building, mezzanine level.

ERNIE WRITES:
The D's have introduced a proposal to delay Ballard's budget passing tomorrow. They are going to try and move it into tomorrow nights agenda at the beginning of the meeting. We need to make sure that we have activists in the gallery to but a stop to this at the very beginning of the meeting. Signs and bodies should work.

The intent of the proposal is to embarrass Ballard by re-introducing funding for the Arts next month. Can you get the word out?
Ernie

The U.S. Mortgage Bailout Bill ...they came up with all this in just two days

Text of Draft Proposal for Bailout Plan

LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL FOR TREASURY AUTHORITY

TO PURCHASE MORTGAGE-RELATED ASSETS

Section 1. Short Title.

This Act may be cited as ____________________.

Sec. 2. Purchases of Mortgage-Related Assets.

(a) Authority to Purchase.--The Secretary is authorized to purchase, and to make and fund commitments to purchase, on such terms and conditions as determined by the Secretary, mortgage-related assets from any financial institution having its headquarters in the United States.

(b) Necessary Actions.--The Secretary is authorized to take such actions as the Secretary deems necessary to carry out the authorities in this Act, including, without limitation:

(1) appointing such employees as may be required to carry out the authorities in this Act and defining their duties;

(2) entering into contracts, including contracts for services authorized by section 3109 of title 5, United States Code, without regard to any other provision of law regarding public contracts;

(3) designating financial institutions as financial agents of the Government, and they shall perform all such reasonable duties related to this Act as financial agents of the Government as may be required of them;

(4) establishing vehicles that are authorized, subject to supervision by the Secretary, to purchase mortgage-related assets and issue obligations; and

(5) issuing such regulations and other guidance as may be necessary or appropriate to define terms or carry out the authorities of this Act.

Sec. 3. Considerations.

In exercising the authorities granted in this Act, the Secretary shall take into consideration means for--

(1) providing stability or preventing disruption to the financial markets or banking system; and

(2) protecting the taxpayer.

Sec. 4. Reports to Congress.

Within three months of the first exercise of the authority granted in section 2(a), and semiannually thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the Committees on the Budget, Financial Services, and Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committees on the Budget, Finance, and Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate with respect to the authorities exercised under this Act and the considerations required by section 3.

Sec. 5. Rights; Management; Sale of Mortgage-Related Assets.

(a) Exercise of Rights.--The Secretary may, at any time, exercise any rights received in connection with mortgage-related assets purchased under this Act.

(b) Management of Mortgage-Related Assets.--The Secretary shall have authority to manage mortgage-related assets purchased under this Act, including revenues and portfolio risks therefrom.

(c) Sale of Mortgage-Related Assets.--The Secretary may, at any time, upon terms and conditions and at prices determined by the Secretary, sell, or enter into securities loans, repurchase transactions or other financial transactions in regard to, any mortgage-related asset purchased under this Act.

(d) Application of Sunset to Mortgage-Related Assets.--The authority of the Secretary to hold any mortgage-related asset purchased under this Act before the termination date in section 9, or to purchase or fund the purchase of a mortgage-related asset under a commitment entered into before the termination date in section 9, is not subject to the provisions of section 9.

Sec. 6. Maximum Amount of Authorized Purchases.

The Secretary’s authority to purchase mortgage-related assets under this Act shall be limited to $700,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time

Sec. 7. Funding.

For the purpose of the authorities granted in this Act, and for the costs of administering those authorities, the Secretary may use the proceeds of the sale of any securities issued under chapter 31 of title 31, United States Code, and the purposes for which securities may be issued under chapter 31 of title 31, United States Code, are extended to include actions authorized by this Act, including the payment of administrative expenses. Any funds expended for actions authorized by this Act, including the payment of administrative expenses, shall be deemed appropriated at the time of such expenditure.

Sec. 8. Review.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

Sec. 9. Termination of Authority.

The authorities under this Act, with the exception of authorities granted in sections 2(b)(5), 5 and 7, shall terminate two years from the date of enactment of this Act.

Sec. 10. Increase in Statutory Limit on the Public Debt.

Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking out the dollar limitation contained in such subsection and inserting in lieu thereof $11,315,000,000,000.

Sec. 11. Credit Reform.

The costs of purchases of mortgage-related assets made under section 2(a) of this Act shall be determined as provided under the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, as applicable.

Sec. 12. Definitions.

For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:

(1) Mortgage-Related Assets.--The term “mortgage-related assets” means residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before September 17, 2008.

(2) Secretary.--The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Treasury.

(3) United States.--The term “United States” means the States, territories, and possessions of the United States and the District of Columbia.

OGDEN ON POLITICS: Get over there and read!

Paul Ogden is busy at work. Today he asks why we aren't using the gladitorium's retractable roof for which will will likely never pay off.

Right on target he declares it is time for the city council to investigate public private partnerships. I have a feeling what will be found is insider dealings that make Monroe Gray look like a choir boy.

Finally, and this is the most sickening of all, he writes that Mayor Ballard sided with the Sports Corporation against the people on the selling of the Pan Am Plaza to Peterson crony Kite Development. It looks like Ballard is gunning for the money to go for sports rather than the massive budget shortfalls and debts of the taxpayers. Ogden says he has not given up on the Mayor and believes that he's being bamboozled by Bob Grand and Joe Loftus at Barnes & Thornburg. Grand and Loftus were quick to surround and insulate Ballard. They were his escorts to meet President Bush in New Albany right after the election and had his ear the entire trip. That seems to be when the stealing of our Mayor began.

Gary Welsh, who writes Advance Indiana, was first to report on Ballard's choice to turn his back on us.

There needs to be an intervention with OUR Mayor on behalf of the People. I hope he is not losing his way.

Behind Closed Doors, Warnings of Calamity

Do you trust these thieves? I sure don't. Make sure your Congressman knows. Write, phone, fax...do all three on Monday. NO BAILOUTS! --Melyssa for HFFT

NY TIMES
WASHINGTON — Gathered in the conference room just off House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s personal suite on the second floor of the Capitol, the Congressional leadership had just received the sobering news Thursday night that America’s economy remained in peril despite a series of sudden interventions by the Federal Reserve.

hen the other shoe dropped. Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. told top members of both parties — about to leave Washington to assail one another in a bitter election season — that they had no choice but to pull together and quickly pass legislation providing billions of public dollars to take bad assets off the hands of the nation’s financial institutions.

“Do you know what you are asking me to do?” said Senator Harry Reid, the Democratic majority leader who has struggled all year against concerted Republican opposition, according to multiple participants at the Thursday night session. “It takes me 48 hours to get the Republicans to agree to flush the toilets around here.”

At that point, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader who duels constantly with Mr. Reid, reached over to assure his colleague they could work it out. “Harry,” Mr. McConnell said, “I think we need to do this, we should try to do this and we can do this.”

As Congress waited Friday for details of the plan, Congressional officials said members of both parties remained willing to move ahead despite reservations from the rank-and-file about exposing taxpayers to staggering costs that have yet to be disclosed.

In telephone briefings with lawmakers, Mr. Paulson and the Fed chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, sought to make it clear that the price of doing nothing could be calamitous.

“If we don’t get this, it will be nothing short of a disaster for our markets,” Mr. Bernanke told House Republicans in a conference call Friday, according to a detailed account of the call.

At the same time, Democrats sought to make it clear the final proposal had to take care of the general public as well as Wall Street.

Referring to a phone conversation with President Bush early Friday, Ms. Pelosi said: “As I told the president this morning, we are committed to quick, bipartisan action while ensuring that we uphold key principles — insulating Main Street from Wall Street and keeping people in their homes by reducing mortgage foreclosures, restoring market confidence and protecting American taxpayers from incurring hundreds of billions of dollars of debt.”

Yet it is evident that sentiments disclosed by the financial officials in the meeting Thursday night and in other briefings have made a strong impression on Congress. And the seriousness with which the administration is approaching the issue was evident in the fact that Mr. Bush for the first time in weeks also telephoned Mr. Reid, with whom he has had a strained relationship, to ask for his help in pushing through legislation.

Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Democrat, said that the Thursday-night session contained not a bit of levity and that the description of the financial predicament made him gulp. “When you get 20 politicians together and no one makes a joke, you know something is going on,” he said.

Although Mr. Schumer and others have declined to repeat precisely what they were told by Mr. Paulson and Mr. Bernanke, they said the two men described the financial system as effectively bound in a knot that was being pulled tighter and tighter by the day.

“There was a long pause in the room,” Senator Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut and chairman of the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, said.

In the Republican conference call Friday, Mr. Bernanke sought to remind lawmakers that voters have money at risk, not just Wall Street executives.

“Many of your constituents hold money in money markets — those funds are losing money,” he said, according to the account of the call provided by a listener. He blamed the deep problems in the housing market and said that the “critical issue is what do we do about these bad assets clogging up our credit system.”

The financial crisis comes at a delicate time for Congress. Lawmakers had been preparing to dispose of a few legislative issues and then adjourn at the end of next week for the elections. But the push for financial legislation has upended the schedule and given the two parties some incentive to work together.

Republicans warned Friday that Democrats should not try to take advantage of the situation, with Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the Republican leader, saying the plan has to be kept “as simple and straightforward as possible.”

“Loading it up to score political points or fit a partisan agenda will only delay the economic stability that families, seniors and small businesses deserve,” he said.

Some conservatives who had already raised the alarm over federal intervention in the markets remained deeply skeptical of the plan.

“We are being asked to go ‘all in’ with taxpayer dollars, and once our government and the taxpayer is on the hook, there is no fallback option,” said Representative Jeb Hensarling of Texas, chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee. “My fear is that taxpayers will be left with the mother of all debts, the federal government becomes the lender and guarantor of last resort and our nation finds itself on the slippery slope to socialism.”

Yet Republican leaders appeared determined to go along with the administration plan. “This is a very serious, very unpleasant problem to deal with,” said Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, No. 3 in the Senate Republican leadership. “But we must act next week to solve this situation.”

In their Friday conference call with Treasury and Fed officials, House Democrats, according to participants, accepted that the bailout was necessary but also faulted the administration for a reckless economic approach that combined deregulation, deficit spending and bad management.

In the closed-door Thursday night meeting, Democrats sought to make it clear to Republicans that the underlying initiative for the financial rescue was coming from the administration and that it was the White House that owned the proposal.

Participants said Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, the majority leader, was particularly emphatic, noting that the administration was requesting unprecedented action on short notice, effectively telling Congress, “Trust us.”

BLOOMBERG: Treasury Seeks Asset-Buying Power Unchecked by Courts

Keep in mind...these are appointed officials (like an arts council) and not elected officials controlling your money! WAKE UP FRIENDS! WAKE UP!

Treasury Seeks Asset-Buying Power Unchecked by Courts
By Alison Fitzgerald and John Brinsley

Sept. 21 (Bloomberg) -- The Bush administration sought unchecked power from Congress to buy $700 billion in bad mortgage investments from financial companies in what would be an unprecedented government intrusion into the markets.

Through his plan, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson aims to avert a credit freeze that would bring the financial system and the world's largest economy to a standstill. The bill would prevent courts from reviewing actions taken under its authority.

``He's asking for a huge amount of power,'' said Nouriel Roubini, an economist at New York University. ``He's saying, `Trust me, I'm going to do it right if you give me absolute control.' This is not a monarchy.''

As congressional aides and officials scrutinized the proposal, the Treasury late yesterday clarified the types of assets it would purchase. Paulson would have authority to buy home loans, mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage- related assets and, after consultation with the Federal Reserve chairman, ``other assets, as deemed necessary to effectively stabilize financial markets,'' the Treasury said in a statement.

The Treasury would also have discretion, after discussions with the Fed, to make non-U.S. financial institutions eligible under the program.

The plan would raise the ceiling on the national debt and spend as much as the combined annual budgets of the Departments of Defense, Education and Health and Human Services. Paulson is asking for the power to hire asset managers and award contracts to private companies. Most provisions of the proposal expire after two years from the date of enactment.

Markets `Fragile'

Paulson spent the morning today appearing on the Sunday television talk shows to build public support for his plan. He urged quick approval by Congress, saying financial markets are ``fragile.'' While the plan should have ``mortgage relief components,'' he suggested legislative changes should be kept to a minimum.

``We want this to be clean, we want this to be quick,'' Paulson said on Fox News Sunday.

Speaking on NBC's ``Meet the Press, he said: ``This is not a position where I like to see the taxpayer, but it is far better than the alternative.'' He added that assets bought by the Treasury would later be sold, recovering some money for the government.

A failure by the government to support the U.S. financial system could lead to ``a depression,'' Senator Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat told reporters yesterday. ``To do nothing is to risk the kind of economic downturn this country hasn't seen in 60 years.''

Buyer of Last Resort

The Treasury is seeking authority to step in as buyer of last resort for mortgage-linked assets that few other financial institutions in the world want to buy, following government takeovers of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and insurer American International Group Inc.

``Democrats will work with the administration to ensure that our response to events in the financial markets is swift,'' House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a statement.

The majority party will seek to reduce mortgage foreclosures and create ``fast-track authority'' for an overhaul of financial regulation, Pelosi said. Democrats will ensure ``the government is accountable to the taxpayers in any future actions under this broad grant of authority, implementing strong oversight mechanisms.''

The proposal will include curbs on executive pay for the companies whose assets the government will be buying, Steve Adamske, a spokesman for Representative Barney Frank, said yesterday in an interview.

Preventing Foreclosures

Democrats also will include a plan to stem foreclosures, which may involve tapping the loan-modification abilities of the Federal Housing Administration, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., and Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, Adamske said. Frank, a Democrat from Massachusetts, is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said that while he has misgivings about the rescue plan, ``the consequences of inaction could be catastrophic.''

``While the Bush proposal raises some serious issues, we need to resolve them quickly,'' he said yesterday in a statement. ``I am confident that, working together, we will.''

House minority leader John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, said yesterday he is reviewing the proposal but didn't say whether he was inclined to support it.

``The American people are furious that we're in this situation, and so am I,'' Boehner said in a statement. ``We need to do everything possible to protect the taxpayers from the consequences of a broken Washington.''

Protection for Taxpayers

Congress, which may pass legislation as soon as Sept. 26, needs to ``make sure there are protections built in for taxpayers,'' said Schumer, a New York Democrat on the banking committee. Lawmakers should ensure ``taxpayers who gave the money will be put ahead of the stockholders, bondholders and others.''

Yesterday on Capitol Hill, legislative aides wearing polo shirts and jeans instead of their usual business suits filed into the House Financial Services Committee hearing room to question Treasury officials including David Nason, assistant secretary for financial institutions, and Neel Kashkari, a senior adviser to Paulson and former investment banker at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., where the Treasury secretary was previously chief executive officer.

Paulson is seeking an expansion of federal influence over markets that hasn't been seen since the Great Depression, said Charles Geisst, author of ``100 Years of Wall Street'' and a finance professor at Manhattan College in New York.

Depression Era Agency

Geisst likened the plan to the Reconstruction Finance Corp., which was chartered by Herbert Hoover in 1932 with the goal of boosting economic activity by lending money after credit markets seized up.

President George W. Bush said he called leaders in both houses of Congress and ``found a common understanding of how severe the problem is and how necessary it is to get something done quickly.''

``This is going to be a big package because it's a big problem,'' Bush said following a meeting with Colombian President Alvaro Uribe at the White House. ``We need to get this done quickly, and the cleaner the better.''

Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama said in a radio address that he ``fully supports'' Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke's efforts to stabilize the financial system. The plan, however, should benefit both main street and Wall Street, he said.

McCain Comments

Republican Presidential nominee John McCain ``looks forward'' to reviewing the proposal while focusing at least in part on ``minimizing the burden on the taxpayer,'' said Jill Hazelbaker, communications director for the McCain campaign.

The ban on legal challenges of actions by Treasury is ``distasteful, it's unfortunate and it's bad precedent, but this is an emergency and you have to act,'' said Jerry Markham, a law professor at Florida State University and author of ``A Financial History of the United States.''

``What you don't want happen is to have lawsuits that will slow things down and cause problems,'' he said.

The proposal would raise the nation's debt ceiling to $11.315 trillion from $10.615 trillion and require the Treasury secretary to report back to Congress three months after Treasury first uses its new powers, and then semiannually after that.

Paulson would gain discretion to act as he ``deems necessary'' to hire people, enter into contracts and issue regulations related to a revival of U.S. mortgage finance, according to a three-page proposal. The Treasury would ``take into consideration'' protecting taxpayers and promoting market stability.

Reverse Auctions

The Treasury may hire managers to purchase the assets through so-called reverse auctions, seeking the lowest prices, Treasury said yesterday. The document specifies that Treasury may buy only assets issued or originated on or before Sept. 17.

The House will pass legislation to implement the plan by the end of this week, and the Senate will act soon after, Frank said on Sept. 19 in an interview on Bloomberg Television's ``Political Capital with Al Hunt.''

Bush said yesterday he's unconcerned that the price tag on the package may seem high.

``I'm sure there are some of my friends out there that are saying, `I thought this guy was a market guy, what happened to him?''' the president said. ``My first instinct was to let the market work, until I realized, while being briefed by the experts, how significant this problem became.''

The Bush administration seeks ``dictatorial power unreviewable by the third branch of government, the courts, to try to resolve the crisis,'' said Frank Razzano, a former assistant chief trial attorney at the Securities and Exchange Commission now at Pepper Hamilton LLP in Washington. ``We are taking a huge leap of faith.''

To contact the reporter on this story: Alison Fitzgerald in Washingtont ; John Brinsley in Washington at jbrinsley@bloomberg.net

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly Orders Cheney to Preserve Records

Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly sounds like a courageous lady who sees the injustice of the misery that the Cheney-Bush administration has brought onto the American people. Read, be informed of the details.

THE NATION: Paulson Bailout Plan a Historic Swindle


Financial-market wise guys, who had been seized with fear, are suddenly drunk with hope. They are rallying explosively because they think they have successfully stampeded Washington into accepting the Wall Street Journal solution to the crisis: dump it all on the taxpayers. That is the meaning of the massive bailout Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has shopped around Congress. It would relieve the major banks and investment firms of their mountainous rotten assets and make the public swallow their losses--many hundreds of billions, maybe much more. What's not to like if you are a financial titan threatened with extinction?

If Wall Street gets away with this, it will represent an historic swindle of the American public--all sugar for the villains, lasting pain and damage for the victims. My advice to Washington politicians: Stop, take a deep breath and examine what you are being told to do by so-called "responsible opinion." If this deal succeeds, I predict it will become a transforming event in American politics--exposing the deep deformities in our democracy and launching a tidal wave of righteous anger and popular rebellion. As I have been saying for several months, this crisis has the potential to bring down one or both political parties, take your choice.

Christopher Whalen of Institutional Risk Analytics, a brave conservative critic, put it plainly: "The joyous reception from Congressional Democrats to Paulson's latest massive bailout proposal smells an awful lot like yet another corporatist lovefest between Washington's one-party government and the Sell Side investment banks."

A kindred critic, Josh Rosner of Graham Fisher in New York, defined the sponsors of this stampede to action: "Let us be clear, it is not citizen groups, private investors, equity investors or institutional investors broadly who are calling for this government purchase fund. It is almost exclusively being lobbied for by precisely those institutions that believed they were 'smarter than the rest of us,' institutions who need to get those assets off their balance sheet at an inflated value lest they be at risk of large losses or worse."

If Wall Street gets away with this, it will represent an historic swindle of the American public--all sugar for the villains, lasting pain and damage for the victims. My advice to Washington politicians: Stop, take a deep breath and examine what you are being told to do by so-called "responsible opinion." If this deal succeeds, I predict it will become a transforming event in American politics--exposing the deep deformities in our democracy and launching a tidal wave of righteous anger and popular rebellion. As I have been saying for several months, this crisis has the potential to bring down one or both political parties, take your choice.

Christopher Whalen of Institutional Risk Analytics, a brave conservative critic, put it plainly: "The joyous reception from Congressional Democrats to Paulson's latest massive bailout proposal smells an awful lot like yet another corporatist lovefest between Washington's one-party government and the Sell Side investment banks."

A kindred critic, Josh Rosner of Graham Fisher in New York, defined the sponsors of this stampede to action: "Let us be clear, it is not citizen groups, private investors, equity investors or institutional investors broadly who are calling for this government purchase fund. It is almost exclusively being lobbied for by precisely those institutions that believed they were 'smarter than the rest of us,' institutions who need to get those assets off their balance sheet at an inflated value lest they be at risk of large losses or worse."

Let me be clear. The scandal is not that government is acting. The scandal is that government is not acting forcefully enough--using its ultimate emergency powers to take full control of the financial system and impose order on banks, firms and markets. Stop the music, so to speak, instead of allowing individual financiers and traders to take opportunistic moves to save themselves at the expense of the system. The step-by-step rescues that the Federal Reserve and Treasury have executed to date have failed utterly to reverse the flight of investors and banks worldwide from lending or buying in doubtful times. There is no obvious reason to assume this bailout proposal will change their minds, though it will certainly feel good to the financial houses that get to dump their bad paper on the government.

A serious intervention in which Washington takes charge would, first, require a new central authority to supervise the financial institutions and compel them to support the government's actions to stabilize the system. Government can apply killer leverage to the financial players: accept our objectives and follow our instructions or you are left on your own--cut off from government lending spigots and ineligible for any direct assistance. If they decline to cooperate, the money guys are stuck with their own mess. If they resist the government's orders to keep lending to the real economy of producers and consumers, banks and brokers will be effectively isolated, therefore doomed.

Only with these conditions, and some others, should the federal government be willing to take ownership--temporarily--of the rotten financial assets that are dragging down funds, banks and brokerages. Paulson and the Federal Reserve are trying to replay the bailout approach used in the 1980s for the savings and loan crisis, but this situation is utterly different. The failed S&Ls held real assets--property, houses, shopping centers--that could be readily resold by the Resolution Trust Corporation at bargain prices. This crisis involves ethereal financial instruments of unknowable value--not just the notorious mortgage securities but various derivative contracts and other esoteric deals that may be virtually worthless.

Despite what the pols in Washington think, the RTC bailout was also a Wall Street scandal. Many of the financial firms that had financed the S&L industry's reckless lending got to buy back the same properties for pennies from the RTC--profiting on the upside, then again on the downside. Guess who picked up the tab? I suspect Wall Street is envisioning a similar bonanza--the chance to harvest new profit from their own fraud and criminal irresponsibility.

If government acts responsibly, it will impose some other conditions on any broad rescue for the bankers. First, take due bills from any financial firms that get to hand off their spoiled assets, that is, a hard contract that repays government from any future profits once the crisis is over. Second, when the politicians get around to reforming financial regulations and dismantling the gimmicks and "too big to fail" institutions, Wall Street firms must be prohibited from exercising their usual manipulations of the political system. Call off their lobbyists, bar them from the bribery disguised as campaign contributions. Any contact or conversations between the assisted bankers and financial houses with government agencies or elected politicians must be promptly reported to the public, just as regulated industries are required to do when they call on government regulars.

More important, if the taxpayers are compelled to refinance the villains in this drama, then Americans at large are entitled to equivalent treatment in their crisis. That means the suspension of home foreclosures and personal bankruptcies for debt-soaked families during the duration of this crisis. The debtors will not escape injury and loss--their situation is too dire--but they deserve equal protection from government, the chance to work out things gradually over some years on reasonable terms.

The government, meanwhile, may have to create another emergency agency, something like the New Deal, that lends directly to the real economy--businesses, solvent banks, buyers and sellers in consumer markets. We don't know how much damage has been done to economic growth or how long the cold spell will last, but I don't trust the bankers in the meantime to provide investment capital and credit. If necessary, Washington has to fill that role, too.

Finally, the crisis is global, obviously, and requires concerted global action. Robert A. Johnson, a veteran of global finance now working with the Campaign for America's Future, suggests that our global trading partners may recognize the need for self-interested cooperation and can negotiate temporary--maybe permanent--reforms to balance the trading system and keep it functioning, while leading nations work to put the global financial system back in business.

The agenda is staggering. The United States is ill equipped to deal with it smartly, not to mention wisely. We have a brain-dead lame duck in the White House. The two presidential candidates are trapped by events, trying to say something relevant without getting blamed for the disaster. The people should make themselves heard in Washington, even if only to share their outrage.

By William Greider

OBAMA: Go back to sleep sheeple

INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY calls it !


Congress Lies Low To Avoid Bailout Blame

By TERRY JONES
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Thursday, September 18, 2008 4:30 PM PT

Congress says it likely will adjourn this month having done nothing on the most important issue in America right now: the financial meltdown from the subprime lending crisis.

Can Congress just walk away from a problem it helped create? Maybe, maybe not.

There's now some talk of a grand deal between the Treasury, the Fed and Congress for a "permanent" solution: creating a government agency to buy up all the bad subprime debt, just like the Resolution Trust Corp. did with bad real estate in the 1980s and 1990s.

Already, the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve are spending hundreds of billions of dollars to keep the subprime crisis from crashing the world economy. The collapse of twin mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, along with the failures of Lehman Bros., Bear Stearns and insurer AIG, expose taxpayers to more than $1 trillion in liabilities.

Until now, Congress has been surprisingly passive. As Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid put it, "no one knows what to do" right now.

Funny, since it was a Democrat-led Congress that helped cause the problems in the first place.

When House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently barked "no" at reporters for daring to ask if Democrats deserved any blame for the meltdown, you saw denial in action.

Pelosi and her followers would have you believe this all happened because of President Bush and his loyal Senate lapdog, John McCain. Or that big, bad predatory Wall Street banks deserve all the blame.

"The American people are not protected from the risk-taking and the greed of these financial institutions," Pelosi said recently, as she vowed congressional hearings.

Only one problem: It's untrue.

Yes, banks did overleverage and take risks they shouldn't have.

But the fact is, President Bush in 2003 tried desperately to stop Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from metastasizing into the problem they have since become.

Here's the lead of a New York Times story on Sept. 11, 2003: "The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago."

Bush tried to act. Who stopped him? Congress, especially Democrats with their deep financial and patronage ties to the two government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie and Freddie.

"These two entities ­ Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ­ are not facing any kind of financial crisis," said Rep. Barney Frank, then ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. "The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."

It's pretty clear who was on the right side of that debate.

As for presidential contender John McCain, just two years after Bush's plan, McCain also called for badly needed reforms to prevent a crisis like the one we're now in.

"If Congress does not act," McCain said in 2005, "American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole."

Sounds like McCain was spot on.

Open Letter to Governor Daniels regarding Tremco no bid scheme & asbestos found in their project

Governor Daniels promises he's working on the schools, yet we still don't have the bidding process opened and Tremco, thanks to their Ice Miller mercenary lobbyists, are still leaving havoc in our schools and raping our taxpayers. Read this open letter from Diana Vice:

Dear Governor, Attorney General, Legislators, School Superintendents, School Board Members, State Fire Marshal, and Local Prosecutors,

The public safety of Indiana school children is in serious question due to the illegal bidding scheme perpetrated on taxpayers by the AEPA/Wilson Education Center/Tremco no-bid scheme. Please take few minutes to read this recent incredible story where school children have recently been exposed to asbestos from a Tremco-related roofing project. This made the news last week.

This is what I've been trying to tell people for months. Indiana bidding laws require an independent architect or engineer to approve roofing projects, but these laws have been repeatedly violated. Not only are there asbestos-related issues involved, but roofing involves fire-rated materials. The structural integrity must also be assessed to avoid roof collapses. There are very real consequences involved, and the safety of Indiana school children has been compromised because none of the AEPA/WEC/Tremco roof jobs were subject to Indiana's strict bidding laws.

Independent architects or engineers were NOT used in these projects as required by law. This can be verified by a State Board of Accounts audit report as well as sworn testimony that is part of a Hamilton County court record in the Baker vs. Tremco matter.

Please take a few minutes to read what these teachers, school children, and their parents are going through now. A Pennsylvania school was ordered closed due to this incredible nightmare that these people are living.

Has my daughter been exposed to asbestos? How will we ever know since we have allowed a situation to continue in Indiana where the fox is guarding the hen house? Have your children been exposed? I would like for my school board to order the roof in question to be properly tested by an independent roofing expert, an independent architect, and/or an independent engineer. I don't ever want to have to respond to those commercials wherein the question is asked, "Do you or a loved one have Mesothelioma?" Please act now. Thank you.

It's time for a real taxpayer revolt!!! I think it's time for taxpayers to seriously consider filing a class action lawsuit against all the parties involved, and possibly other government officials who have allowed this scheme to continue. Forget the Big Indy Law Firms! They've had their hands in our pockets for way too long, and they should not be rewarded for it. Besides, some of these Big Indy Lawfirms may become defendants themselves since the Wilson Education Center was given the legal advice to pursue the circumvention of bidding laws even after they were told that it was illegal by the State Board of Accounts and an attorney from the Department of Education. I just hope some of these lawyers have good malpractice policies. Let's go to Chicago to find a law firm that will be willing to represent the interests of taxpayers. Please contact me if you're interested in pursuing this.

Also, a deposition has been scheduled in the matter of Tremco Vs. Taxpayers United for Fairness. This will be our opportunity to ask Tremco's president, Deryl Kratzer, questions about these issues. If anyone has any information that is pertinent to this subject, please contact me as soon as possibly so we can be sure to add it to our list of questions.

Once again, I call on American taxpayers to boycott RPM products until the Board of Directors from Tremco's parent company puts a stop to the types of taxpayer abuse that I've exposed. Check this link for a reminder. RPM has reportedly already sold one of its companies due to asbestos related issues. Check that sotry out at this link.

Here's a recent blogpost from Janet Campbell's blog. Campbell is a California architect and original Tremco whistleblower. This story demonstrates what I've been saying all along. Roofing is a public safety issue even though officials at the Wilson Education Center would like to convince others that it's not. This is one situation where I do not want to be in the position to say, "I told you so!" Check here to see what can happen to someone who has been exposed to asbestos.

According to the articles referred to below in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: A roofing contractor's workers on an elementary school job in Pittsburgh, PA discovered possible asbestos on the job while performing the work. Work continued while tests were made that proved positive for asbestos, with faculty and students left in place.A School Board member questioned the Tremco Rep as to why they had not tested the roof for asbestos prior to the start of work; their reply was that the School District had supplied them with documentation that there was no asbestos in the existing roof. According to the articles, so far, two School Board Members had not yet received a copy of that documentation said to have been supplied by the School District.Updates as they happen……From the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, excerpts below:

Park Elementary School remains closed
Thursday, September 18, 2008
By Mary Niederbergerhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08262/912974-55.stm
"Park Elementary School in Munhall remained closed today as district officials await the results of air sampling tests taken at the school where asbestos was found Sept. 5 during a roof replacement project."

"The district was notified Sept. 8 that core samples taken from the roof tested positive for asbestos. Parents were notified Tuesday afternoon, and 350 students in grades one through five continued to attend the school until it was closed Tuesday night."

"Dave Zazac, a spokesman for the Allegheny County Health Department........said the type of asbestos found in the roof was compressed, rather than airborne, and was unlikely to pose any health risk to students or staff.

Similar comments were made by Bruce Mancini, of Tremco, the roofing project manger, at Tuesday's board meeting. But parents said they did not believe him and questioned why information about the asbestos was kept from them.

At the meeting, Park fourth-grade teacher Kevin Tomasic produced a chunk of the roof that he said a student had given to him. He said the chunk would be sent for testing.

Mr. Zazac .... described the material as 'foam that was bonded to the roof' and said it did not contain asbestos. The district release said contractor Phoenix Roofing notified the district Sept. 5 that workers suspected asbestos was present in the roofing material they were removing."

"When district administrators learned Sept. 8 that the materials tested positive for asbestos, the roofing project was stopped.Despite those test results, Mark Cherpak, the district's director of operational services, told a Post-Gazette reporter Sept. 11 that the district was still unsure whether asbestos was in the roof.

On Monday, Mr. Cherpak acknowledged that he lied and confirmed that asbestos had been found in six of eight core samples taken from the roof. He said he did so because not all of the school board members knew and he didn't want them reading about it in the newspaper.

The district did not inform parents that asbestos was in the roof until after an article about it appeared Tuesday in the Post-Gazette. That afternoon, students took home a letter in their weekly information folder from the school."

"Mrs. Cannon and other board members questioned Mr. Mancini on Tuesday about why his firm didn't test roof samples for asbestos before embarking on the project. Mr. Mancini said the district provided him with an asbestos inspection report from 2005 that said the school was asbestos-free.

Board members told Mr. Cherpak they wanted to see copies of that report to determine who did the inspection. As of yesterday, neither Mrs. Terrick nor Mrs. Cannon had received a copy.

Mrs. Cannon expressed anger at Tuesday's meeting that the roofing project was still in process during the school year. She said the schedule for the project called for it to be completed before school started Aug. 28.

If the project had gone as scheduled, she said, the asbestos problem would have been discovered 'before the kids ever went into that building.' "

And excerpts below from:

Asbestos closes Munhall school
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
By Mary Niederbergerhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08261/912686-55.stm
"Two days after Steel Valley school officials acknowledged asbestos had been found in the roof of Park Elementary School, district officials announced that the school will be closed until concerns over the asbestos have been resolved."

"The roofing contractor, Phoenix Roofing, has submitted an asbestos abatement plan to the health department, and board members said last night they also want to review that document.
The discovery of the asbestos did not become public until yesterday, when it was published in an article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. That disclosure, and a letter that was sent home with students yesterday, brought dozens of parents to last night's board meeting, many of them expressing concern for their children's safety.

On Monday, the district's director of operations, Mark Cherpak, confirmed for the Post-Gazette that repair work on the roof had stopped and that asbestos had been found in the core samples.
Mr. Cherpak also acknowledged that he lied to a Post-Gazette reporter when he was asked on Sept. 11 if there was asbestos in the school building's roof. At the time, he said the tests on the core samples had not been completed. However, the district received the report on the core samples on Sept. 8, and board members were briefed on the results the following day."

"At last night's meeting, Bruce Mancini, of Tremco, the firm that is supplying materials for the roofing project, told parents that the asbestos found in the roof was not friable, or airborne, and posed no health threat.

Acting board President Pam Terrick said students would not return to the school until officials were assured by county health officials that the school was safe."

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Ron Paul takes on Bernacke...(Why isn't he on McCain's cabinet list?)

I know that many of our readers are going to vote for McCain solely because of Palin. Keep in mind, that McCain, not Palin will have power.

Also ask yourself, what is McCain going to do about the economy. McCain himself has admitted that he's no expert on economic matters. BUT...Dr. Ron Paul is. And McCain has done nothing to reach out to Dr. Paul to help his administration if elected.

Take a look at this December 2007 video that shows Dr. Ron Paul laying into the Fed and Bernanke.

What happened to the PMI in the Freddie/Fannie meltdown?

"The question I keep asking and no one wants to answer is what happened to the Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) the homeowner paid for before foreclosing. If PMI is meant to insure the MORTGAGOR against default, why are these banks going under??? The PMI insurers should be taking the losses!!!"
The comment above was a response to a Washington Post article "Calling Out the Culprits Who Caused the Crisis".

Can any of our readers answer the question? It's a good one.

INVESTORS ALERT: Security depository holds 99% of all stock & holds $20 trillion (yes trillion) in assets

While surfing today, I found this startling information that there is a company with $20 TRILLION in assets. I recommend all of our readers take a look. Have you heard of this company before? Please comment freely, as I want to hear some analysis.

Mark my words. We're being set up. I recommend you plan accordingly.

Meet Senate Candidate Steve Keltner @ Wine Tasting Fundraiser

MEET STEVE KELTNER FOR WINE & DISCUSSION
ENDORSED CANDIDATE FOR INDIANA SENATE DISTRICT 30

Steve is hard at work on many problems facing Indiana's economy including property tax repeal, healthcare, and insurance reform.

One of the other lesser known projects Steve Keltner, senate candidate district 30, is working on is to lift the ban on shipping products from Indiana's wine manufacturers. He has networked with Indiana's wine manufacturers for months on this issue.

Indiana is one of the top wine producing states in the nation. Our local manufacturers and our economy will benefit by opening access to ship wine out of the state. Here's the invite:



Please join Steve Keltner for a glass of forbidden fruit...
Well, forbidden to be shipped anyway!
When: Thursday, October 2, 2008 - 6:00 - 8:00pm
Where: Deano's Vino - Voted Indy's Best Wine Bar
1112 Fountain Square, Indianapolis, IN. 46203

Enjoy some of the Indiana's bottled artistry
and discuss why our legislators are limiting the sale of this precious art form.

Expect a rather vigorous discussion on the blue laws as well.

Come out to support your favorite candidate (and wine enthusiast) in his campaign to reform healthcare, education, property taxes and make wine legal...again.

Please RSVP by September 30, 2008.
Donation to his campaign is encouraged!