ADVOCATES FOR SELF-RELIANCE, PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY, EQUALITY, VOLUNTEERISM, GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY & CONSTITUTION RULED POLICY
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
You're getting obsessed. I have always loved watching you get obsessed. That's usually when you make a big blunder. Keep going. The blog about Hoosier fair taxation and property taxes has turned into an incoherent Obama-slamming hate site. Congratulations on that, Mely.
Keep up the good work Melyssa! The left always attacks the messenger when they don't like the message. The truth hurts.
No hatred for Obama...just for socialist ideology.In fact, in January 2008 I was planning to vote for Obama thinking it would be a great psychological boost to 2/3 of the people on this planet whose skin color is the same.But then I read about his background to learn all I could about who he is.I learned that Obama's closest friends are socialists and criminals. I also believe that he Obama sold his soul to the global elite ESTABLISHMENT and plans to carry out their agenda which is what Bush did. If you want to see what's coming to America, check out England and Canada. Did you know that they microchips their cops already? How long until infants are microchipped?YIKES! Can you say hello socialist big brother?You would greatly benefit from gathering your information somewhere other than an Obama rally or the controlled mainstream media.
Obama The Dummy -Brzezinski The VentriloquistBy Webster G. Tarpley5-19-8WASHINGTON, DC -- In my book Obama The Postmodern Coup: The Making of a Manchurian Candidate, I argue that presidential candidate Barack Obama is a wholly owned puppet of Zbigniew Brzezinski and his associates of the Trilateral Commission, founded by David Rockefeller. As some have noted, Brzezinski has been attempting to conceal his actual domination of the Obama campaign, for which he is the chief guru and controller. Now a rhetorical outburst by Obama on the campaign trail in Oregon has once again pointed to the reality that Obama is a ventriloquist's dummy, with the Russia-hating fanatic Brzezinski, a barbarous relic of the Cold War, acting as the ventriloquist.At a recent campaign stop in Oregon, Obama stated:"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK," Obama said. "That's not leadership. That's not going to happen," he added. If India and China's "carbon footprint gets as big as ours, we're gone." (AFP)This remarkable statement reveals the true program of a future Obama administration: savage austerity, brutal economic sacrifice, and a massive further reduction in the standard of living of the depleted and exhausted US population as demanded by David Rockefeller, George Soros, and Obama's Wall Street backers. This will be done under left cover through a global warming tax, a third world solidarity tax, and other demagogic frauds, with the revenue going to bail out Goldman Sachs, Citibank, and JP Morgan Chase. The tired, discredited post-9/11 "war on terror" slogans will be dumped. Most interesting is that Obama's sound bytes are actually a sloganized version of a key passage from Zbigniew Brzezinski's recent book Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower (New York: Basic Books, 2007), pp. 198-199. This book contains Zbig's desperate strategy for preserving the crisis-ridden US-UK world empire, including by making the US "social model" more attractive to developing sector publics. Zbig writes:"In mutually compounding ways, material self-indulgence, persistent social shortcomings, and public ignorance about the world increase the difficulty the American democracy faces in formulating a globally appealing platform for effective world leadership. Americans must recognize that their patterns of consumption will soon collide head-on with increasingly impatient egalitarian aspirations. Whether through the exploitation of natural resources, excessive energy consumption, indifference to global ecology, or the exorbitant size of houses for the well-to-do, indulgent self-gratification at home conveys indifference to the persisting deprivations of much of the world. (Just try to imagine a world in which 2.5 billion Chinese and Indians consume as much energy per capita as Americans do.) That reality the American public has yet to assimilate. To lead, America must not only be sensitive to global realities. It must also be socially attractive. That calls for a broader national consensus in favor of correcting the key failings of the American social model."Obama has thus unmasked himself as the exterminating angel of super-austerity dictated by the elitist Trilateral bankers' clique. Will he cut the current US standard of living by 40%? By 50%? When he does, will he still call it the politics of hope? Obama has been trained to hate the American people through two decades of association with hate-mongers like Reverend Wright, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, and Brzezinski himself. For Rockefeller and Soros, Obama's hatred of the American people is a positive guarantee that he will enforce Wall Street's austerity decrees with a vengeance. Forget the utopian platitudes and the messianic rhetoric: Obama's real economic program is now clear for all to see. It is a path that leads to genocide against the US population, among others.Obama's Oregon outburst needs to be read in the light of earlier unguarded statements by Michelle Obama, who has said at various times in her stump speech: "before we can work on the problems, we have to fix our souls - our souls are broken in this nation. If we can't see ourselves in one another, we will never make those sacrifices.We need a different leadership because our souls are broken. We need to be inspired...to make the sacrifices that are needed to push us to a different place. The change Barack is talking about is hard, so don't get too excited because Barack is going to demand that you too be different." Here the theme of purification and redemption by means of sacrifice and economic austerity is clearly conveyed. Now Barack has begun to fill in the details.Insiders have long recognized that Zbigniew Brzezinski (helped by his son Mark) owns and runs Obama. David Ignatius has pointed to Second Chance as a scenario for a future Obama administration. Ignatius commented over a year ago: "Zbigniew Brzezinski has written a new book that might be a foreign policy manifesto for Barack Obama The most intriguing part of Brzezinski's book is what I would describe as the Obama manifesto. (David Ignatius, "A Manifesto for the Next President," Washington Post, March 14, 2007) It has also long been known that Zbig does the thinking for Obama; the London Economist last year hailed "a new brain for Barack Obama! It's 78 years old and it still works perfectly. It belongs to Zbigniew Brzezinski, the peppery ex-national security adviser to Jimmy Carter." ("A New Brain for Barack Obama, Economist.com, March 14, 2007)Obama's campaign has long been attacking Bush from the right, criticizing the current regime for not exploiting 9/11 to impose savage economic austerity, as seen in Samantha Power's "monster" interview. We now have good evidence that Obama will flay the American people alive with his elitist economic policies. Obama has committed a major error by showing his hand. Will voters react in time to stop him?
When you join the socialist party (New Party Socialists) you shouldn't be surprised to be identified as such. Unless I've missed something, there's been no renunciation from Senator Obama of his membership in that party.The history of socialism is exactly failure; failing to understand that history isn't a recipe for success.Moreover, the concept "From each according to his ability to each according to his need," is worse than socialism- it's f*ck!ng Marxism! Selling out the lives of Americans, one parasitic program at a time, destroys liberty and does nothing to make ours a better country.The perpetual practice of socialists to divide us, ethnically, financially, etc., is an effort to consolidate their power (and dissolve our Constitutionally acknowledged rights), not our freedom as Americans. How do we survive as the United Hates of America?
Seriously Mel? Come on......I guess I must be a boozer then, because there are 10+ liquor stores within 3 miles of my home.
FOR DES:These aren’t just neighbors, Des. These are people with whom he built his political career and has very close relationships with all of them. It’s scary. As a country, we are seriously headed toward a socialist state with Obama in charge of the presidency, Pelosi in charge of the house, and a senate democratic majority. Do the checking and learn about his past ties with these characters. He launched his political career in Bill Ayers home and was appointed a board position to the Annenberg Foundation by Ayers. Not only that, Obama has close ties with ACORN who is behind all that voter registration fraud. At one point Obama was their legal counsel, he’s volunteered with them, and money is shared between the two camps. Now if you hung out at liquor store and had a 20+ year close relationship, I would not want you running my company or my country…fair enough? These aren’t just neighbors, Des. Again, they are VERY close allies and mentors. Mainstream news is covering up the truth. Obama is the guy that has been vetted and approved by puppeteer behind our government. Maybe you don’t believe the puppeteer exists, but mark my words…you will by the end of his presidency. I hope it was not lost on you that the market shot up when the bailout failed. When the bailout of Wall Street was approved, the market tanked.Shall I go into the illegal campaign contributions Obama accepts? Don’t believe me, just google “Obama” “Doodad”. Doodad is listed as campaign contributor. Shall we discuss the fact that Obama will not release any, not a single one, of his college records. We can’t even read his dissertation. Why is that? What would you think if we could not have access to Palin’s or McCain’s school or military records? As far as president, both candidates are bought and paid for by the global elite Establishment. The same cabal of bankers that ultimately own the media. Of the two media approved candidates, McCain/Palin is the lesser evil. That is unless you think it is just fine to violate our constitution and put a candidate in office who is likely not a legal U.S. citizen. Did you know that Obama will not release his birth certificate, nor will he release his medical records? All the other candidates have done so. Why won’t Obama? There are still 5 or 6 pending lawsuits against Obama and the DNC concerning his constitutional qualification to be president. But you don’t hear about THAT in the media. The original lawsuit filed by democrat Phil Berg was thrown out of court by a judge, I believe, was forced to do so. That lawsuit is being appealed to the Supreme Court. Obama has not proven he is a U.S. citizen. At one time he was an Indonesian citizen and his paternal grandmother claims he was born inside Kenya. The media has covered up the truth. I’ve known about all of this since February because I don’t watch the mainstream talking heads to get my news. I get it directly from the blogs. That story was broken by a law clerk on a blog where the suit was filed. The general public didn’t find out about the citizenship question until last week. In some parts of the country, when people found out from mainstream media, voting centers were already operational. I knew the day the citizenship lawsuit was filed, every word that it said. And before it was filed, I knew that there was a lot of suspicion concerning Obama’s place of birth. I’ve gone from supporting Obama in January 2008…to actively warning my friends about his policies. There is simply way too much smoke here for there not to be a fire.
Twas the night before electionsAnd all through the townTempers were flaringEmotions all up and down!I, in my bathrobeWith a cat in my lapHad cut off the TVTired of political crap.When all of a suddenThere arose such a noiseI peered out of my windowSaw Obama and his boysThey had come for my walletThey wanted my payTo give to the othersWho had not worked a day!He snatched up my moneyAnd quick as a winkJumped back on his bandwagonAs I gagged from the stinkHe then rallied his henchmenWho were pulling his cartI could tell they were outTo tear my country apart!" On Fannie, on Freddie,On Biden and Ayers!On Acorn, On Pelosi"He screamed at the pairs!They took off for his causeAnd as he flew out of sightI heard him laugh at the nationWho wouldn't stand up and fight!So I leave you to thinkOn this one final note-IF YOU DONT WANT SOCIALISMGET OUT AND VOTE!!!!
Newsmax.comSecret, Foreign Money Floods Into Obama CampaignMonday, September 29, 2008 9:23 PMBy: Kenneth R. TimmermanMore than half of the whopping $426.9 million Barack Obama has raised has come from small donors whose names the Obama campaign won't disclose.And questions have arisen about millions more in foreign donations the Obama campaign has received that apparently have not been vetted as legitimate.Obama has raised nearly twice that of John McCain's campaign, according to new campaign finance report.But because of Obama’s high expenses during the hotly contested Democratic primary season and an early decision to forgo public campaign money and the spending limits it imposes, all that cash has not translated into a financial advantage — at least, not yet.The Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee began September with $95 million in cash, according to reports filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).The McCain camp and the Republican National Committee had $94 million, because of an influx of $84 million in public money.But Obama easily could outpace McCain by $50 million to $100 million or more in new donations before Election Day, thanks to a legion of small contributors whose names and addresses have been kept secret.Unlike the McCain campaign, which has made its complete donor database available online, the Obama campaign has not identified donors for nearly half the amount he has raised, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP).Federal law does not require the campaigns to identify donors who give less than $200 during the election cycle. However, it does require that campaigns calculate running totals for each donor and report them once they go beyond the $200 mark.Surprisingly, the great majority of Obama donors never break the $200 threshold.“Contributions that come under $200 aggregated per person are not listed,” said Bob Biersack, a spokesman for the FEC. “They don’t appear anywhere, so there’s no way of knowing who they are.”The FEC breakdown of the Obama campaign has identified a staggering $222.7 million as coming from contributions of $200 or less. Only $39.6 million of that amount comes from donors the Obama campaign has identified.It is the largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.Biersack would not comment on whether the FEC was investigating the huge amount of cash that has come into Obama’s coffers with no public reporting.But Massie Ritsch, a spokesman for CRP, a campaign-finance watchdog group, dismissed the scale of the unreported money.“We feel comfortable that it isn’t the $20 donations that are corrupting a campaign,” he told Newsmax.But those small donations have added up to more than $200 million, all of it from unknown and unreported donors.Ritsch acknowledges that there is skepticism about all the unreported money, especially in the Obama campaign coffers.“We and seven other watchdog groups asked both campaigns for more information on small donors,” he said. “The Obama campaign never responded,” whereas the McCain campaign “makes all its donor information, including the small donors, available online.”The rise of the Internet as a campaign funding tool raises new questions about the adequacy of FEC requirements on disclosure. In pre-Internet fundraising, almost all political donations, even small ones, were made by bank check, leaving a paper trail and limiting the amount of fraud.But credit cards used to make donations on the Internet have allowed for far more abuse.“While FEC practice is to do a post-election review of all presidential campaigns, given their sluggish metabolism, results can take three or four years,” said Ken Boehm, the chairman of the conservative National Legal and Policy Center.Already, the FEC has noted unusual patterns in Obama campaign donations among donors who have been disclosed because they have gone beyond the $200 minimum.FEC and Mr. Doodad ProWhen FEC auditors have questions about contributions, they send letters to the campaign’s finance committee requesting additional information, such as the complete address or employment status of the donor.Many of the FEC letters that Newsmax reviewed instructed the Obama campaign to “redesignate” contributions in excess of the finance limits.Under campaign finance laws, an individual can donate $2,300 to a candidate for federal office in both the primary and general election, for a total of $4,600. If a donor has topped the limit in the primary, the campaign can “redesignate” the contribution to the general election on its books.In a letter dated June 25, 2008, the FEC asked the Obama campaign to verify a series of $25 donations from a contributor identified as “Will, Good” from Austin, Texas.Mr. Good Will listed his employer as “Loving” and his profession as “You.”A Newsmax analysis of the 1.4 million individual contributions in the latest master file for the Obama campaign discovered 1,000 separate entries for Mr. Good Will, most of them for $25.In total, Mr. Good Will gave $17,375.Following this and subsequent FEC requests, campaign records show that 330 contributions from Mr. Good Will were credited back to a credit card. But the most recent report, filed on Sept. 20, showed a net cumulative balance of $8,950 — still well over the $4,600 limit.There can be no doubt that the Obama campaign noticed these contributions, since Obama’s Sept. 20 report specified that Good Will’s cumulative contributions since the beginning of the campaign were $9,375.In an e-mailed response to a query from Newsmax, Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt pledged that the campaign would return the donations. But given the slowness with which the campaign has responded to earlier FEC queries, there’s no guarantee that the money will be returned before the Nov. 4 election.Similarly, a donor identified as “Pro, Doodad,” from “Nando, NY,” gave $19,500 in 786 separate donations, most of them for $25. For most of these donations, Mr. Doodad Pro listed his employer as “Loving” and his profession as “You,” just as Good Will had done.But in some of them, he didn’t even go this far, apparently picking letters at random to fill in the blanks on the credit card donation form. In these cases, he said he was employed by “VCX” and that his profession was “VCVC.”Following FEC requests, the Obama campaign began refunding money to Doodad Pro in February 2008. In all, about $8,425 was charged back to a credit card. But that still left a net total of $11,165 as of Sept. 20, way over the individual limit of $4,600.Here again, LaBolt pledged that the contributions would be returned but gave no date.In February, after just 93 donations, Doodad Pro had already gone over the $2,300 limit for the primary. He was over the $4,600 limit for the general election one month later.In response to FEC complaints, the Obama campaign began refunding money to Doodad Pro even before he reached these limits. But his credit card was the gift that kept on giving. His most recent un-refunded contributions were on July 7, when he made 14 separate donations, apparently by credit card, of $25 each.Just as with Mr. Good Will, there can be no doubt that the Obama campaign noticed the contributions, since its Sept. 20 report specified that Doodad’s cumulative contributions since the beginning of the campaign were $10,965.Foreign DonationsAnd then there are the overseas donations — at least, the ones that we know about.The FEC has compiled a separate database of potentially questionable overseas donations that contains more than 11,500 contributions totaling $33.8 million. More than 520 listed their “state” as “IR,” which the FEC often uses as an abbreviation for "information requested." Another 63 listed it as “UK,” the United Kingdom.More than 1,400 of the overseas entries clearly were U.S. diplomats or military personnel, who gave an APO address overseas. Their total contributions came to just $201,680.But others came from places as far afield as Abu Dhabi, Addis Ababa, Beijing, Fallujah, Florence, Italy, and a wide selection of towns and cities in France.Until recently, the Obama Web site allowed a contributor to select the country where he resided from the entire membership of the United Nations, including such friendly places as North Korea and the Islamic Republic of Iran.Unlike McCain’s or Sen. Hillary Clinton’s online donation pages, the Obama site did not ask for proof of citizenship until just recently. Clinton’s presidential campaign required U.S. citizens living abroad to actually fax a copy of their passport before a donation would be accepted.With such lax vetting of foreign contributions, the Obama campaign may have indirectly contributed to questionable fundraising by foreigners.In July and August, the head of the Nigeria’s stock market held a series of pro-Obama fundraisers in Lagos, Nigeria’s largest city. The events attracted local Nigerian business owners.At one event, a table for eight at one fundraising dinner went for $16,800. Nigerian press reports claimed sponsors raked in an estimated $900,000.The sponsors said the fundraisers were held to help Nigerians attend the Democratic convention in Denver. But the Nigerian press expressed skepticism of that claim, and the Nigerian public anti-fraud commission is now investigating the matter.Concerns about foreign fundraising have been raised by other anecdotal accounts of illegal activities.In June, Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi gave a public speech praising Obama, claiming foreign nationals were donating to his campaign.“All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man,” the Libyan leader said. “They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency..."Though Gadhafi asserted that fundraising from Arab and African nations were “legitimate,” the fact is that U.S. federal law bans any foreigner from donating to a U.S. election campaign.The rise of the Internet and use of credit cards have made it easier for foreign nationals to donate to American campaigns, especially if they claim their donation is less than $200.Campaign spokesman LaBolt cited several measures that the campaign has adopted to “root out fraud,” including a requirement that anyone attending an Obama fundraising event overseas present a valid U.S. passport, and a new requirement that overseas contributors must provide a passport number when donating online.One new measure that might not appear obvious at first could be frustrating to foreigners wanting to buy campaign paraphernalia such as T-shirts or bumper stickers through the online store.In response to an investigation conducted by blogger Pamela Geller, who runs the blog Atlas Shrugs, the Obama campaign has locked down the store.Geller first revealed on July 31 that donors from the Gaza strip had contributed $33,000 to the Obama campaign through bulk purchases of T-shirts they had shipped to Gaza.The online campaign store allows buyers to complete their purchases by making an additional donation to the Obama campaign.A pair of Palestinian brothers named Hosam and Monir Edwan contributed more than $31,300 to the Obama campaign in October and November 2007, FEC records show.Their largesse attracted the attention of the FEC almost immediately. In an April 15, 2008, report that examined the Obama campaign’s year-end figures for 2007, the FEC asked that some of these contributions be reassigned.The Obama camp complied sluggishly, prompting a more detailed admonishment form the FEC on July 30.The Edwan brothers listed their address as “GA,” as in Georgia, although they entered “Gaza” or “Rafah Refugee camp” as their city of residence on most of the online contribution forms.According to the Obama campaign, they wrongly identified themselves as U.S. citizens, via a voluntary check-off box at the time the donations were made.Many of the Edwan brothers’ contributions have been purged from the FEC database, but they still can be found in archived versions available for CRP and other watchdog groups.The latest Obama campaign filing shows that $891.11 still has not been refunded to the Edwan brothers, despite repeated FEC warnings and campaign claims that all the money was refunded in December.A Newsmax review of the Obama campaign finance filings found that the FEC had asked for the redesignation or refund of 53,828 donations, totaling just under $30 million.But none involves the donors who never appear in the Obama campaign reports, which the CRP estimates at nearly half the $426.8 million the Obama campaign has raised to date.Many of the small donors participated in online “matching” programs, which allows them to hook up with other Obama supporters and eventually share e-mail addresses and blogs.The Obama Web site described the matching contribution program as similar to a public radio fundraising drive.“Our goal is to bring 50,000 new donors into our movement by Friday at midnight,” campaign manager David Plouffe e-mailed supporters on Sept. 15. “And if you make your first online donation today, your gift will go twice as far. A previous donor has promised to match every dollar you donate.”FEC spokesman Biersack said he was unfamiliar with the matching donation drive. But he said that if donations from another donor were going to be reassigned to a new donor, as the campaign suggested, “the two people must agree” to do so.This type of matching drive probably would be legal as long as the matching donor had not exceeded the $2,300 per-election limit, he said.Obama campaign spokesman LaBolt said, “We have more than 2.5 million donors overall, hundreds of thousands of which have participated in this program.”Until now, the names of those donors and where they live have remained anonymous — and the federal watchdog agency in charge of ensuring that the presidential campaigns play by the same rules has no tools to find out.CLARIFICATIONThe original version of this story, published on this Web site Sept. 29, reported that the "IR" listed on 520 overseas donations is "often an abbreviation for Iran."However, FEC spokesman Bob Biersack said Oct. 7 that “IR” generally means “information requested,” not Iran. “That’s often, but not always, what it means,” he said.© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Des, You might not realize this, because the media refuses to give them attention, but there is a HUGE well organized group of unpaid democrat volunteers who actively are working against an Obama election victory. You should read what they say. Anytime you see a blog that requires users to register and they get 500 or more comments with blog posts, you know they have something huge going on. Go to: http://pumapac.org/If this many democrats are working AGAINST Obama, imagine how bad it really is and what you are not being told by mainstream media.
Post a Comment