"The Official Portrait of Miss InDiana"

"The Official Portrait of Miss InDiana"
aka "Miss Victory"

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Ron Paul to unite Occupy & Tea Party

All along, I've wanted the Occupy movement accomplish something meaningful like the Indiana Tea Party protests did in 2007 when we got property tax capped at 1% and threw out the crooked incumbent mayor who locked citizens out of city hall, gave us a budget with blank pages, and borrowed the city's operating expenses from the bond bank.

Witout the Tea Party, the Occupy movement does not represent the 99%. They represent roughly half, give or take. A united Occupy and Tea Party is the formidable opponent to the presstitutes and the elites who give the orders.

Advances are being made now to unite the two movements and Ron Paul is the guy to get the job done.

Back in September, I bought a catered dinner on behalf of the Tea Party and delivered it to 50 of our Occupy Indy protestors. Some of them were homeless, so I am sure it was appreciated. I made sure they all knew I was a tea party leader and they are not different than me. I wanted them to know that we are all in the same boat and that because of capitalism I was able to buy their dinner and crony capitalism (corporatism) along with the Federal Reserve is why America finds herself where she is today.

Both Occupy and the Tea Party is disenfranchised by people we are supposed to be able to trust.

Ron Paul’s full comments on the Occupy Movement:
That in a way is a challenging question, because along with that question, I get a lot of times asked about the Tea Party movement. The Tea Party movement started here, gets big, a lot of different people come in. I think the same thing has happened with Occupy. I put them together—I put both groups together. Because I think both groups are unhappy about what’s happening in Washington, and around the country, and the economic conditions. But their complaints are somewhat different.

The Tea Party people basically say the debt is too big and we should shrink the size of government. Occupation seems to be more addressing the subject of the very rich, and I think that can be a mixed blessing in the sense that in my talk already I’ve criticized many people on Wall Street and the people who get rich because they get special benefits from the government, whether they get contracts or whether they benefit from the devaluation of the currencies, or whether they get their bailouts, yes, we should address that. I think the Occupy people are.

But people who are wealthy in a free market who give an honest service or an honest product and they are rewarded by the consumer, they’re quite different. They have to be protected. We shouldn’t be jealous or envious of those people. So you can’t put them all together. So in many ways, I identify with both groups. There are some things the groups have changed a little bit. The first time the tea party movement was noted was December 16th four years ago when there was a spontaneous fundraising rally for our campaign. But it’s changed a lot. A lot of people come in. But I think it’s healthy.

I think if some people like to paint Occupy left and the Tea Party people right, but I think it makes my point. There’s a lot of people unhappy, and they’re not so happy with the two party system because we have had people go in and out of office, congress changes, the presidency changes, they run on one thing, they do something else. Nothing ever changes. And I sort of like it because I make the point that if you’re a Republican or Democrat the foreign policy doesn’t really change, even though there’s a strong Republican tradition of the foreign policy I’ve been talking about where we don’t get involved in policing the world. Does the monetary policy change? Do they really care about reining in the Fed? Would the Fed bail out all these countries around the world? More and more people know that now. But monetary policy doesn’t change .

Do we ever cut back? No. There’s no pretense to cutting back. They’re not even talking about cutting back. They’re talking about a token cut to proposed increases. All that talk about cutting a trillion dollars over the next 10 years, they don’t even want to start until 2013, and then they want to string it out. And it’s just cutting what’s automatically built into the budget.

But the Tea Party and Occupy people are just tired of it all. And they would like to see changes. And if the conditions get much worse, the demonstrations on the streets could get much worse, too. And that’s what we have to be aware of. But fortunately we still live in a free enough society where they can speak out. If they violate property rights, if anybody violates property rights, they do it at risk. Because that means they’re practicing civil disobedience and they might have to suffer the consequences. But there are sometimes people believe civil disobedience in order to make a point on what’s wrong with our laws that’s, they have to understand, that’s the risk they take. But basically I think it’s healthy on both sides, both the Tea Party movement and the Occupy movement.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I think the venn diagram is dead-on and that a majority of America agrees on the problem, even if not the solution. I don't see President Obama being defeated without his opponent(s) getting enough middle voters by declaring that corruption is corruption, regardless of where it comes from in our demographics.