I am very saddened by Andrew Breitbart's death at an unusually young age.
I am curious how the media knew so quickly that the cause of death was "natural". He is reported to have sipped on red wine, while sparring over politics just 50 minutes before his death.
Should Breitbart had sat on the film he claimed existed?
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Breitbart: I Have Obama College Films
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(Atom)
5 comments:
They knew because the death was first reported at breitbart's own site.
My hunch is those videos don't exist. One of the conservative new media's criticism of mainstream media is that mainstream media outlets have supposedly sat on stories that would hurt liberal politicians. Breitbart should've shown these videos at CPAC, not teased about them.
According to Advance Indiana, Big Government will release the video in 7 to 10 days. Any clue why they would delay further?
Gary also reported that Breitbart collapsed on the sidewalk leaving the bar.
I just can't wrap my head around a vivacious 43 year old man collapsing of "natural causes".
Infowars is reporting that the planned release of the tapes was March 1st, just hours after he died.
That's one hell of a coincidence to say the least.
http://www.infowars.com/breitbart-wait-til-they-see-what-happens-march-1st/
With all due respect, Melyssa, just because he was energetic and out there doesn't mean he wasn't ill.
There's been rumblings on some sites that it was a heart attack. And that's pretty much one of the first things that comes to mind when a 30 or 40 something male collapses all of sudden, in addition to a stroke.
You wouldn't know it by looking at me, but I have a cardiac pacemaker. I was just fortunate enough to have my cardiac problems diagnosed. Too many men, unfortunately, don't get to that point.
I hear you Matt, but the timing of it is so odd, you know?
Post a Comment